Untitled Document
 Welcome to my Web Site
Love Life Leslie Burke Campaign 2000 Will to Live
Untitled Document
» Contact Les » Feedback to web master
Untitled Document


Leslie Burke

»

BMA Policy

Untitled Document
» What's New?
» Home
» In the beginning
» The withholding of artificial nutrition and hydration
» What the Papers said before the judgment
» The Judgment
» What the Papers said after the Judgment
» The Government Intervention
» What the Papers said before the Appeal
» The Appeal
» What the Papers said during the Appeal
» The Appeal Judgment
» What the Papers said after the Appeal Judgment
» Before the ECtHR Appeal
» The ECtHR Reject Appeal
» What the Papers said after the ECtHR Reject Appeal
» The Continuing Debate
» External Web Site Links
Get Adobe ReaderFree Counters
Content starts here
Llandudno

British Medical Association Policy

At the British Medical Association’s Annual Representative Meeting on the 1st July 2004 the following policy statement was approved:

That this Meeting believes that patients who lose their capacity but who have indicated in advance that they wish to receive artificial hydration and nutrition should have their wishes respected”.

This expands on the more general statement Medical Ethics Today (2nd edition) update on page 353 of Medical Ethics Today that: 'If the patient is known to have held the view that there is intrinsic value in being alive, then life-prolonging treatment would, in virtually all cases, provide a net benefit for that particular individual.'

Next
Untitled Document

Background

» In the beginning
» Something is going wrong
» What I decided to do
» Background on this case
» BMA policy on Artificial Hydration and Nutrition
Untitled Document

End of life - withdrawing and withholding treatment

» British Medical Association policy
» General Medical Council policy
 
© 2004 Les Burke