Right to life case
                        goes to Europe -  
                        Leslie Burke lodges appeal at ECtHR
                         
                        Right to receive artificial nutrition
                        Leslie Burke, 46, who suffers
                        from a rare and progressive neurological condition will today
                        take his case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 
                        Leslie is fighting for the right
                        to receive artificial nutrition and hydration once he is unable
                        to voice his wishes. 
                        "I am doing this because
                        I feel that I have been left with no alternative. I am not seeking
                        to have my life prolonged unnecessarily by invasive medical procedures
                        - I would just like to have the opportunity to receive artificial
                        nutrition and hydration (ANH) up until the very end," said
                        Leslie. 
                        Leslie has previously challenged
                        the General Medical Council's (GMC) guidelines on when life sustaining
                        treatment should be withdrawn in the High Court and in the Court
                        of Appeal. 
                        
  
                        Healthcare law expert
                        His solicitor, Muiris Lyons,
                        partner and healthcare law expert at Irwin Mitchell incorporating
                        Alexander Harris will today lodge an application on Leslie's
                        behalf with the Court in Strasbourg. 
                        "Leslie is determined to
                        take his case to Strasbourg to ask the European Court of Human
                        Rights to rule that his human rights are breached by the current
                        GMC guidance," said Muiris. 
                        "Leslie is concerned that
                        after assessing his condition following a significant deterioration,
                        doctors may decide that his condition is so severe and the prognosis
                        so poor that even though death is not imminent, providing artificial
                        nutrition or hydration may cause suffering, or be too burdensome
                        in relation to the possible benefits. They may then decide to
                        discontinue this life-sustaining treatment. 
                        "This would be contrary
                        to his wishes - which he fears may be ignored or overruled because
                        he is considered to lack the capacity to decide for himself." 
                        "This is his ultimate nightmare
                        scenario - to have the decision as to when such treatment is
                        withdrawn taken out of his hands and to potentially suffer a
                        long, slow and painful death while fully or at least partially
                        conscious of what is happening to him." 
                         
                       |